Many users dismissed calls for safety oversight of open source AI as out-of-touch cartel control, arguing providers face no legal responsibility for model harms.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 7 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@_aidan_clark_ As long as open source providers are not legally and penally responsible for the consequences of their models the open source community won't understand what going on. They seem to think it's a free lunch
@_aidan_clark_ You are Klaus Schwab level out of touch if you think 4 company "committee" (cartel) should be in charge of my code review can and can't-s. No amount of safety is worth slavery,
@_aidan_clark_ To be fair tho... and I say this as someone who has had a foot in both open/closed camps for ~10 years... OS diehards are a hell of a lot less rich, famous, and powerful for their position than closed source diehards. Not sure the bias argument is a winning strategy here.
Dean is getting flak for being a company guy, but I’m equally as disappointed in all the OS diehards who don’t want to admit that this isn’t just another people of software. Your bias is shining through just as clearly.
Many users dismissed calls for safety oversight of open source AI as out-of-touch cartel control, arguing providers face no legal responsibility for model harms.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 7 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.