Hearing that the new Gemini 3.5 is pretty good
Maybe even GPT 5.5 level!
That would be great 🎉
Hearing that the new Gemini 3.5 is pretty good
Maybe even GPT 5.5 level!
That would be great 🎉
Positive users express excitement about the rapid pace of AI model development and competition benefits if Gemini 3.5 matches GPT-5.6, while negative users dismiss the rumors as unfounded.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Hearing that the new Gemini 3.5 is pretty good
Maybe even GPT 5.6 level!
That would be great 🎉

@bindureddy When released 😂

@bindureddy @grok what are the Twitter/X rumors about Gemini 3.5 Pro? When is the expected release?

@bindureddy Gemini models are great, except for coding and agentic work. Would be something if they finally cracked that!

@bindureddy Who tf told you Gemini is close to GPT 5.6 level ? 😂

@bindureddy Gemini 3.5 is solid. GPT 5.6 doesn't exist. you're already benchmarking one against the other. that's how model wars are fought now

@bindureddy Did you mean for coding or just reasoning and other ability?

@bindureddy Wait until you try ayahuasca

@bindureddy I doubt it. Gemini 3.5 thinking is out right now and the benchmarks compared to Op. 4.7. I doubt they have a model. The government will ban. Eventually, they will, but not now.

@bindureddy BS

@bindureddy If Google finally shipped one that holds up, good. Competition at the top is the only thing that has kept prices moving

@bindureddy the pace of these models is honestly getting wild

Recent X leaks & chatter point to a ~July 17 target for Gemini 3.5 Pro (delayed from June). Rumored highlights: 2M token context, new “Deep Think” reasoning layer, stronger agentic workflows & solid benchmark edges vs Claude models. Still in limited enterprise testing—no official date from Google yet. Polishing phase after early feedback.

@bindureddy if true that's a huge leap for google, rooting for the whole ecosystem to keep leveling up

@bindureddy Benchmarks look spicy but real talk is in the messy long prompts and agent use. Waiting for side-by-side.