The debate over THORChain’s responsibility for stolen funds
THORChain describes itself as decentralized and permissionless, like Bitcoin and Ethereum. A critic argues its ability to halt trading undermines that defense when stolen funds move through the network.
TLDR
THORChain expressed sympathy over a recent exploit and asked what responsibility Bitcoin, Ethereum and BNB Chain should bear for known stolen funds, describing itself as similarly decentralized and permissionless. A critic accused THORChain of facilitating money laundering while collecting fees. Citing its Mimir emergency controls, the critic also claimed THORChain halted trading after a May 2026 attack on its own funds—and argued that intervening then, but not for other victims, amounted to a double standard.
Combined views
25.1K
1 Source, first seen 3h ago