Many users agree open-weight LLMs are essential for AI understanding and societal benefit because of open-source's strong track record and competitive advantages, while a few cite deployment failures from missing data provenance.
Based on 22 visible X reactions from 35 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@MelMitchell1 The open-source software movement failed spectacularly, and soon there will be no software at all. Juniors across the industry will be replaced with AI, then seniors will retire with nobody to replace them, and that will be the end of software engineering.
@MelMitchell1 Completely agree. If the same amount of investments go to open source models as have gone to models developed by @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI, AI innovations would become more democratic with more competition in the economy.
@MelMitchell1 Thanks for sharing your thoughts. Some of us definitely care what you think, including those of us who have read your excellent book.
@_ash_ran @MelMitchell1 Why don't you want to see cancer get cured? You are a bad person.
Exactly! This is what all these heavily politicized, self-serving AI takes that are emerging against open-source AI completely dismiss. I concede that business dynamics change and that uncertainty is uncomfortable, but if you consider what the history of open-source has been, the benefits are clear for scientific progress and humanity.
Many users agree open-weight LLMs are essential for AI understanding and societal benefit because of open-source's strong track record and competitive advantages, while a few cite deployment failures from missing data provenance.
Based on 22 visible X reactions from 35 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.