PCMag gave MSI’s Pro MP165 E6 an Editors’ Choice award in a review published Sept. 18, calling it a strong budget pick in the portable-monitor category.
The 15.6-inch display is priced at $94.99, putting it squarely in the sub-$100 range that PCMag framed as its main appeal. In the review, the outlet said the monitor delivers the basics shoppers at that price are likely to want, including both USB-C and HDMI connectivity, a built-in kickstand, and a lightweight portable design.
A rare full-size HDMI port at this price
One detail PCMag singled out was the monitor’s port selection. The review lists HDMI and USB-C as video inputs, and notes that the left edge includes two USB-C ports and one HDMI port. Reviewer Tony Hoffman wrote that this is one of the few full-size HDMI ports he has seen on a portable monitor, adding that many competing models use mini HDMI instead.
That matters because portable monitors often lean on slimmer connectors to fit their frames, so a full-size HDMI port can make it easier to connect common laptops and other devices without needing the less common mini-HDMI cable standard.
Built for basic work setups
PCMag also highlighted the monitor’s flexibility for simple desk or travel use. The Pro MP165 E6 has a built-in tilt-adjustable kickstand, and the review says that stand also integrates a tripod socket. MSI also included support for 75mm VESA mounting, though the bracket is not included.
Those features help position the display as more than a basic second screen you prop up in a folio case. Between the kickstand, tripod support, and VESA compatibility, PCMag described it as unusually accommodating for a low-cost portable monitor.
Best for everyday tasks, with tradeoffs
The review’s verdict was favorable but not universal. PCMag said its testing suggested the Pro MP165 E6 is best for everyday work rather than photo editing or movie watching. It also listed several strengths and weaknesses that explain that positioning.
On the plus side, PCMag said the display exceeded its brightness rating in testing. On the downside, the review cited limited color coverage with muted red tones and described the on-screen display controls as clunky.