A machine-learning model trained on thousands of electrocardiogram recordings identifies a previously unrecognized group of at-risk people
https://go.nature.com/4v0h2zB
It flags at-risk patients missed by traditional clinical methods
A machine-learning model trained on thousands of electrocardiogram recordings identifies a previously unrecognized group of at-risk people
https://go.nature.com/4v0h2zB
Positive users praise the AI ECG models for detecting new waveform signals tied to cardiac death risks, while negative users criticize the reports for omitting baseline data on normal readings.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
UC Berkeley researchers say a new AI model found a hidden ECG signal that could help doctors identify more people at risk before sudden cardiac death. https://www.fox5dc.com/news/ai-may-spot-deadly-heart-risk-routine-ecg?taid=6a42b62fbbf4b00001c44c6e&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=trueanthem&utm_source=twitter

@Nature I am in the clear

@Nature If you have no S wave, isn’t that the first pre-requisite for ST elevation?
(I’m an immunologist don’t judge me… I’ve never been able to read an ECG 🙊)

@Nature WAVEFORM DETECTOR!!

@fox5dc @Scobleizer Good 👍

@Nature what does it not show. start there - what does nature magazine have to do with electrocardio pulse registers and what is considered normal and baseline which you chart does not show at all for consideration by any reader even a trained cardiologist im certain