/TECH

Developer Adapts Executor-Advisor Pattern With GPT-5.6 And Fable 5

Commentary on X

Highest ranked

@omarsar0 @SrinivasValekar Yes you can choose multiple providers for multiple specific roles designated by omp. Omp within orca is AGI. Orca still has some small kinks to work through but from my experience this is optimal. Also from what I’m reading, Sol better hard problems and fable for long running

Metrics

10h agopublished15comments297

Srinivas@SrinivasValekarTECH

@omarsar0 This is already present in omp cli, and I am using opus 4.8 high as advisor and gpt 5.5 high for building. This setup is insanely good!

Jan Stevens@janstevensTECH

@omarsar0 Executor-Advisor patterns are great when the executor handles heavy lifting and the advisor refines the plan.

Radical Ed 𐤊@Radical_Ed_BadTECH

@omarsar0 Am doing the same with 5.5 and Deepwiki as advisor. wicked smart.

View all

elvis@omarsar0TECH

I am more excited to try this pattern instead. Same Executor-Advisor setup but with GPT-5.6 as the executor and Fable 5 as the advisor. It already works wonderfully using GPT-5.5, so I think 5.6 should make it even stronger. Full tutorial coming soon.:) https://x.com/omarsar0/status/2074890022809911633/photo/1 https://twitter.com/ClaudeDevs/status/2074606058128224365

likes

37reposts

270saves

38.5Kviews

Sentiment

Positive100%0%Negative

Positive Read

Users praise adapting the Executor-Advisor pattern with GPT-5.6 and Fable 5 because the multi-model setup feels optimal, smart, and effective for complex workflows.

Based on 8 visible X reactions from 14 accounts; directional sample.

Digg Deeper

Ask a question below.

Published answers will appear here.