Engineer Nathan Young supported the characterization of Anthropic's protective culture
Engineer Nathan Young supported the characterization of Anthropic's protective culture
@jachiam0 Are you high? Or just psychotic?
@jachiam0 I agree with this a bunch
The OAI / Anthropic values difference is deeply misunderstood, even within the walls of both. Should a loving ensouled machine God watch over humanity? Vote Anthropic. Should humanity be entrusted with the tools of its own progress and destiny? Vote OpenAI.
@TheZvi Personally, no. I think the binary of 'moral saint' versus 'tool for humans' is a false one, and its very simplicity should make people suspicious of it. I think the ideal target tries to balance the benefits and risks of both positions.
ridiculous oversimplification, from a prominent OpenAI employee no less. does this capture your impression of how the two companies have behaved? https://twitter.com/jachiam0/status/2064229228288315726
If you think one will predominate over the other, running away with an unsurpassable lead, totally borked; humanity wants both these outcomes in about equal measure
@jachiam0 @MartinShkreli Huh I'm surprised that would be unclear to people?! I thought this messaging is pretty clear/obvious on both, but sounds like that's just me.
If your lens for analyzing this is "consumer v enterprise business" your ability to understand what's going on is unfixably borked
@jachiam0 Por que no los dos? a plurality of gods & powerful tools is good for competition, especially if one takes the tool view
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
