Positive users praise GPT-5.6 as more complete and capable than Fable in math and work tasks while negative users complain its rate limits burn through too quickly to be usable.
Based on 27 visible X reactions from 43 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
My feeling is that it's the most complete model so far. I love Fable, but GPT 5.6 Sol did AMAZING things, even better than the equivalent in Fable (same prompt), faster and cheaper. Now I'm working on a plugin, based on OMP, that allows Codex to do OMP orchestration. If it works as expected (still in a rudimentar state) it would be the best of all words: Fable, Sol, Grok, Gemini, all together as a happy family. lol
🚀 This feels like OpenAI's biggest workflow upgrade yet, not just another model release. With Sol pushing the frontier, Terra balancing performance and cost, and Luna optimizing speed, the focus is shifting from benchmark wins to real productivity. The real question is whether multi-agent workflows can consistently save hours not just seconds. #OpenAI #GPT56 #AI #GenAI
@kimmonismus This is getting ridiculous. Day 1 hit 5 hour rate limit twice. 65% weekly I wake up this morning spin up a couple Xhigh sessions with fast mode off and this is where I’m at. This is not cool. https://x.com/SilverYogensha/status/2075602607175876688/photo/1
@kimmonismus My first impression is it’s absolutely unusable, rates burn so quick even on pro plan that it’s impossible to use. Tried three times to get something done and but rate limits, I hate it. Bring on Opus 5. Sol is the worst.
@kimmonismus REALLY good. Better at frontier math personally for me than Fable
@tunguz It's a good model, and much more affordable than Fable
strange. My first impression of GPT 5.6 is that is actually really good. Big improvement compared to 5.5, though not as poerful and magical as Fable 5. But still, big leap and so far: i love it. (But rates burn so quick) https://twitter.com/DavidOndrej1/status/2075475109494591491
they are not. they are excellent. https://twitter.com/DavidOndrej1/status/2075475109494591491
Positive users praise GPT-5.6 as more complete and capable than Fable in math and work tasks while negative users complain its rate limits burn through too quickly to be usable.
Based on 27 visible X reactions from 43 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@tunguz It's a good model, and much more affordable than Fable