Positive users welcome open AI models for driving competition, ownership, privacy, and new use cases, while one negative reply criticizes OpenAI's shift from nonprofit to rent-seeking.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 10 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@TaylorLorenz Even more, there's too much focus on the models alone when all the great use cases and products will come from the tools developed *from* the open weights models. The middle entrepreneurs will save us!
@obsidiancap1 @Techmeme @bgurley One thing they did not do for sure is scrap the entirety of human knowledge under the pretense of being a non profit, then turn into a for profit, and gatekeep access to extract rent
“Treating open-model AI instead as a danger to be licensed and contained is a category error, and would be a costly one. It mistakes the ordinary work of competition for a threat to be policed.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/07/20/open-model-ai-is-good-competition-anthropic-openai/
“Sears was not allowed to outlaw Walmart. IBM was not allowed to outlaw Dell. The legacy airlines were not allowed to outlaw Southwest (though they tried).” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/07/20/open-model-ai-is-good-competition-anthropic-openai/
Positive users welcome open AI models for driving competition, ownership, privacy, and new use cases, while one negative reply criticizes OpenAI's shift from nonprofit to rent-seeking.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 10 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Why open source AI? Wonderfully articulated by @bgurley https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2026/07/20/open-model-ai-is-good-competition-anthropic-openai/