Many users dismissed Aswath Damodaran's $10-15 trillion AI market warning as fearmongering or unrealistic because it assumes mass labor replacement, while a few argued AI should augment workers instead to avoid dystopian outcomes.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 22 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@rohanpaul_ai no. it will augment people, not replace them. as it is doing right now. humans will continue to control the machines for a very long time.
@rohanpaul_ai augmentation > replacement. tools scale output while preserving demand, replacement slashes payroll but erodes the market for goods
@rohanpaul_ai Why anybody listened to this joker on Ai, when we have musk and jensen huang people on board.
@rohanpaul_ai Remember that this retard said nvda was expensive when it was at 80
@rohanpaul_ai Replacing people instead of building tools feels dystopian.
The $10-$15 trillion total addressable market for AI, if it is successful, is actually "terrifying". - The famous "Dean of Valuation", Professor Aswath Damodaran, of NYU Stern School of Business. The reason: AI as a tool is a much smaller market; AI as a replacement for human-jobs is where the giant market story comes from. "The best-case scenario for AI, that $10 to $15 trillion market, will happen if ONLY it replaces people. If AI is a tool, it’s going to be a much smaller market than if AI replaces people. So, the stories we’re telling about $10, $20 or $25 trillion markets are actually terrifying stories for the rest of the world. Why? Because if that story comes true, half of all white-collar people are going to lose their jobs. And what are they going to do instead? Who’s going to come up with the income to buy the products and services? If AI works as well as it’s supposed to and replaces people, how do we deal with that as a society? Because people lose their jobs. Not only do you lose your income, you lose your life’s meaning.." ---- Video from "Excess Returns" podcast (full video in quoted tweet, also link to their YT in comment)
Many users dismissed Aswath Damodaran's $10-15 trillion AI market warning as fearmongering or unrealistic because it assumes mass labor replacement, while a few argued AI should augment workers instead to avoid dystopian outcomes.
Based on 10 visible X reactions from 22 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.