@jeremyphoward it's going to be the same as always. "It's too dangerous for you to use! ... Unless, you would be willing to pay us, then we might reconsider. "

even on gov level and selling GPUs to China they did the same. Threat to humanity, unless there's profit to be made.

@jeremyphoward mythos with no guardrails will kill us all (25% chance of human extinction, their words ) but hand it to amazon, apple, microsoft, google, jpmorgan and 150 other corporate? Suddenly it's fine. turns out the apocalypse is only dangerous when poor people have access to it

@jeremyphoward The woes we feared are fallen from the skies, and weigh in earnest on each mortal head.

@jeremyphoward The only constant is how much changes in 8 years, yet some takes from back then still hit different now. 🧠

@jeremyphoward but the examples missed the on the high stakes on today's world.

@math_rachel Quite the prophecy.

@jeremyphoward Eight years on, the empirical record backs this up: misuse studies keep finding closed models in real attack chains too — access restrictions changed the threat model less than predicted. The homogeneity risk got less attention but aged even better.

yes i also think n agree with Oppenheimer - if everyone has it it’s a great stabilizer as mutual destruction is guaranteed - u give n get respect n treated fairly in the world order

same goes for AI

surprisingly ppl who compare ai with nukes (i don’t) get ai policy wrong n as well as nuclear policy

@jeremyphoward You both were always ahead of the rest … Thanks to our conversations back then, @EDAI_Ltd was always build with AI safety and governance in mind.

@jeremyphoward Crazy how fast things move now.

@math_rachel @jeremyphoward If everyone builds it, nobody dies

@jeremyphoward Wild to see how far things have come

Eight years feels like a lifetime in this space