@ethanCaballero and it is warranted
the claude fable 5 nerf for AI research has induced the angriest reaction from AI researchers that I've ever seen in my life
Anthropic released Claude Fable 5 as its strongest generally available model for complex reasoning and agent tasks, complete with Mythos 5 as a less-restricted sibling, yet the built-in classifiers that trigger fallbacks to Opus 4.8 on high-risk prompts have fueled researcher complaints of silent performance drops in biology, AI work, and life sciences even when no refusal occurs.
@ethanCaballero and it is warranted
the claude fable 5 nerf for AI research has induced the angriest reaction from AI researchers that I've ever seen in my life
Users report the model sometimes underperforms prior versions on benign technical queries without warning, prompting Andreas Kirsch to flag premature social panic while others insist the changes feel like intentional steering rather than simple safety switches.
Guillaume Verdon has amplified the frustration, arguing the restrictions slow progress in biotech and ML without clear evidence of risk, leading some subscribers to cancel and explore open alternatives even as the model stays free through mid-June.
Many users expressed strong anger at Claude's nerf on AI research tasks because they see it as unjustified gatekeeping that restricts scientific freedom and hinders progress to protect the company from competition.
It's almost on keep4o levels and people haven't even spent time with the model...
Also there is a social panic bc some folks have recklessly started describing the reduction in effectiveness as the model "sabotaging their work" and then others pick it up and understand it as the model introducing bugs and nerfing their experiments intentionally? 🤦
the claude fable 5 nerf for AI research has induced the angriest reaction from AI researchers that I've ever seen in my life

@ethanCaballero you can jailbreak it pretty easily:

@ethanCaballero Nothing scientists love more than being told what they can or cannot ask.
the claude fable 5 nerf for AI research has induced the angriest reaction from AI researchers that I've ever seen in my life

@ethanCaballero what exactly did they nerf? i keep seeing the rage but nobody posts the diff?

@ethanCaballero Rightly so.
re: Claude Fable 5 intentionally silently nerfs itself when asked to do AI research.
How does the nerf play out in practice? Does Fable 5 intentionally start injecting silent bugs everywhere? or does Fable 5 nerf itself in other way(s)?

@ethanCaballero You bomb the runway after you takeoff from it.

@ethanCaballero most probably some form of routing involving thinking token budgets

@ethanCaballero It is warranted. Science is all about freedom and asking questions (and trying to answer them). There's nothing researchers dislike more than someone telling them what they can or cannot ask.
It's a 9/11 for all scientists (not only AI researchers)

@thedntx @ethanCaballero

@thedntx @ethanCaballero how are you supposed to diff it if you don’t know the baseline

@ethanCaballero They're usually a chill bunch, has to be said (Yann aside)

@ethanCaballero it's unexpected to say the least
at least only ban china and VPNs?

@thedntx @ethanCaballero oh look, a poor who cant afford it 👆

@Gana_L_ @ethanCaballero I mean, people literally died on 9/11 so I would not compare that with Anthropic releasing a gated model.
But the reactions do seem warranted. We'll see how Ant/OAI/GDM react.

@ethanCaballero OpenAI + open source is the way

@ethanCaballero Research communities optimize for exploration and benchmark chasing. Production teams optimize for reproducibility and auditability. The two groups experience the same release very differently.

@ethanCaballero ends up adding just the right regularization to my codebase, checkmate

@ethanCaballero Yeah this is next level, they lost the fanboys even
Anthropic released Claude Fable 5 as its strongest generally available model for complex reasoning and agent tasks, complete with Mythos 5 as a less-restricted sibling, yet the built-in classifiers that trigger fallbacks to Opus 4.8 on high-risk prompts have fueled researcher complaints of silent performance drops in biology, AI work, and life sciences even when no refusal occurs.
@ethanCaballero and it is warranted
the claude fable 5 nerf for AI research has induced the angriest reaction from AI researchers that I've ever seen in my life