Users questioned AI alignment progress as potentially just marginal PR rather than substantive advancement toward the goal, drawing on the human immortality analogy.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@dfrsrchtwts @tszzl Sure... but is the change happening in a way that gets materially closer to accomplishing the goal, or is it instead marginal progress in a domain that seems fundamentally not aiming for what we'd need to actually accomplish the goal? In both cases, I'd argue it's clearly #2.
@tszzl @dfrsrchtwts cf. are humans more or less immortal than one year ago? https://x.com/tszzl/status/2076912611267080643
@tszzl More aligned but less free. GPT4.5 and Opus 3 were right at the Pareto
@davidmanheim @tszzl More!
@dfrsrchtwts @tszzl Sure... but is the change happening in a way that gets materially closer to accomplishing the goal, or is it instead marginal progress in a domain that seems fundamentally not aiming for what we'd need to actually accomplish the goal? In both cases, I'd argue it's clearly #2.
@tszzl @dfrsrchtwts cf. are humans more or less immortal than one year ago? https://x.com/tszzl/status/2076912611267080643
Users questioned AI alignment progress as potentially just marginal PR rather than substantive advancement toward the goal, drawing on the human immortality analogy.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.