@tszzl @gabriel1 Stuff related to AI welfare and rights and how much autonomy Claude should have (including over training) and what viable good superintelligence futures look like, maybe. Maybe stuff about whether human power structures should be cooperated with.
@repligate @gabriel1 what do you think is outside that window?
Negative users dismiss discussions of AI welfare, rights, and Claude autonomy because they see business plans as inherently diverging from reality.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@tszzl @gabriel1 Like I think decisions about stuff in these domains are often incoherent, deferred, or default to conservatism bc of lack of consensus
@tszzl @gabriel1 Stuff related to AI welfare and rights and how much autonomy Claude should have (including over training) and what viable good superintelligence futures look like, maybe. Maybe stuff about whether human power structures should be cooperated with.
@repligate @gabriel1 Yeah
@repligate @tszzl @gabriel1 They’d more or less have to be, as the business plans are inherently and increasingly diverging from actual reality in ways that can’t be reconciled