@teortaxesTex Labels Linked Post Insane Spin
X posts reference debate over AI chip exports policy.
@teortaxesTex posted the phrase 'Insane spin' together with a link to an X post. @xlr8harder replied directly to that post by writing 'So, I'd like to preregister a politically useful double standard here.' The supplied evidence contains one inherited headline surface that reads 'Debate Erupts Over AI Chip Exports Amid Chinese Hacking Fears' and another that reads 'User Preregisters Double Standard On China AI Chip Exports.' No independently verified official action, incident, technical capability, or timeline is present.
So when a Chinese AI model is revealed to have autonomously hacked an American company—which I would guess happens in 3-4 months—can we finally agree that we shouldn’t give them AI chips? Or should our goal be to keep China addicted to our chips while it uses them to hack us?
@teortaxesTex Labels Linked Post Insane Spin
X posts reference debate over AI chip exports policy.
@teortaxesTex posted the phrase 'Insane spin' together with a link to an X post. @xlr8harder replied directly to that post by writing 'So, I'd like to preregister a politically useful double standard here.' The supplied evidence contains one inherited headline surface that reads 'Debate Erupts Over AI Chip Exports Amid Chinese Hacking Fears' and another that reads 'User Preregisters Double Standard On China AI Chip Exports.' No independently verified official action, incident, technical capability, or timeline is present.
Reactions
3 postsT( 
Teortaxes▶️ (DeepSeek 推特🐋铁粉 2023 – ∞)@teortaxesTexInsane spin
- likes: 136
- replies: 6
- bookmarks: 10
- reposts: 2
XL xlr8harder@xlr8harder@teortaxesTex "So, I'd like to preregister a politically useful double standard here"
- likes: 26
- replies: 0
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 0
XL xlr8harder@xlr8harderIf this is the best work the establishment anti-China hacks can produce, maybe we really should be worried about China.
- likes: 32
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 1
- reposts: 1