Positive users endorse the view that custom AI coding setups waste time as vanilla Claude works fine and skill is decisive, while negative users contend that good harnesses improve results and call the claim reductionist or biased.
Based on 13 visible X reactions from 69 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@thdxr @RhysSullivan Totally agree. I use vanilla claude code (purely because of the Max sub) and absolutely zero custom skills and I've never been more productive. The cool thing about being a dev was that if you had an idea, you could make it exist. You can still do that, just way faster now.
@thdxr @RhysSullivan Disagree strongly on this. Clearly there's a large gap in user judgement and intellect that a good harness can reconcile. That's why there's such a huge gap in output quality despite users having access to the same models.
@thdxr @RhysSullivan Dropping bars. All you need is a few decent commands for the repetitive stuff and a lean global rules file, the rest is a waste of time and energy. Oh, and use the TUI, way better experience.
@thdxr @RhysSullivan Amen! Absolutely true! I’ll try an other skill now, the previous ”didn’t work
@thdxr @RhysSullivan "magic box" haha.. are you an engineer, magician, or a hype-artist?
@thdxr @RhysSullivan skill issue diagnosed as a config issue
@thdxr @RhysSullivan just @ me next time ...
Positive users endorse the view that custom AI coding setups waste time as vanilla Claude works fine and skill is decisive, while negative users contend that good harnesses improve results and call the claim reductionist or biased.
Based on 13 visible X reactions from 69 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.