#KostasThoughts: The #computervision community is behind on review transparency. Reviews and meta-reviews should be made public for accepted papers and, if authors opt in, for rejected papers as well.
Transparency can be a powerful mechanism for improving review and meta-review quality.
2028 is coming soon 🤔😉
(Yeah, 😡 with one of our meta-reviews!)
Many users support public reviews for accepted computer vision papers because they would quickly fix meta-review problems and fulfill long-standing desires for enforced open reviewing.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
@CSProfKGD I've been waiting for "Open Reviewing" (passed TC motion at CVPR 2014) and something beyond that (like ICLR) being enforced
@CSProfKGD Seen way too many meta-reviews that just parrot the worst reviewer and call it a day. Sunlight fixes that real quick.
@CSProfKGD I've been waiting for "Open Reviewing" (passed TC motion at CVPR 2014) and something beyond that (like ICLR) being enforced
@yoshitomo_cs I believe it’s just a matter of a group of PCs just doing it.