Heavy AI adoption correlates with increased junior hiring, analysis finds

1:24 AM · Jul 17, 2026

I think you are misrepresenting the data. Even the article you link to says "entry-level job growth has flatlined for those workers most exposed to AI" and includes the graph below. And Brynjolffson et al. (2025) pointed to "early large-scale evidence consistent with generative AI disproportionately impacting entry-level workers". I don't think we can say confidently either way what the impact on jobs from this tech will be: there is already evidence pointing both ways (consistent with it being too early to tell). It feels misleading to suggest it has been "confirmed in the data" that AI tools will not "cost jobs".

JW JASON WEBBER@JAYCEEWEB1

3:17 AM · Jul 17, 2026

The times they are a changing. Almost no one is actively modelling correctly. The writer at the FT might be high 3 or low 4 in a linear world, but that world is in decline. There will be changes, good and bad, those that see them from 6-8 are rare they can conceptualise,they do think outside of the box, they will unite and they will usher in beneficial change. Not the media, simply because if they could they would be doing it. As a 6-8 you must understand this🙏

JW James Wise@Jameswise

1:16 AM · Jul 17, 2026

https://giftarticle.ft.com/giftarticle/actions/redeem/45d19c4f-f478-4ece-b19b-c79ba17273ea AI isn’t destroying entry-level jobs. It’s changing them

LQ Livio Q@livioq

9:11 AM · Jul 17, 2026

@Jameswise Looks like AI has taken the job of the headline writer