Users are excited about Silico reproducing Goodfire's RLFR method to cut Qwen3-8B hallucinations because it shows promising results and potential for safety research, while some worry the team overlooked reasons it could be a bad idea.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 9 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@GoodfireAI I've been telling people Goodfire has been doing good work. And you have been. But this... there is no way no one on your team is unaware of the reasons this might be a bad idea, right? Why do this anyway?
10:15 PM · Jul 14, 2026@GoodfireAI Interesting research. I wonder whether this could be expanded to safety research, where probes for deception, scheming, or harmful intent are used as internal reward signals during training.
6:32 AM · Jul 15, 2026@GoodfireAI gang i requested in like 4 5 months ago plssspslpslpsl give
11:28 PM · Jul 14, 2026…oh, right of course they instantly did that @TheZvi hardest hit
8:57 AM · Jul 15, 2026@teortaxesTex I feel like I should have predicted it would be Goodfire, missed Bayes point and aura farming opportunity.
11:32 AM · Jul 15, 2026The independent lab reproduced the internal-probe RL technique in two days.
@teortaxesTex I feel like I should have predicted it would be Goodfire, missed Bayes point and aura farming opportunity.
11:32 AM · Jul 15, 2026Users are excited about Silico reproducing Goodfire's RLFR method to cut Qwen3-8B hallucinations because it shows promising results and potential for safety research, while some worry the team overlooked reasons it could be a bad idea.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 9 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.