The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in the New York Times copyright lawsuit against OpenAI. Posts from legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others report that the filing takes the position that training large language models on copyrighted texts qualifies as fair use. The filing cites national security, economic prosperity, and scientific progress as reasons to reject claims of infringement. A direct link to the court document on courtlistener.com appears in the visible posts. Replies debate the broader effects on copyright enforcement.
The Trump Administration files a statement of interest in the copyright lawsuit brought by The New York Times against OpenAI, taking the position that it’s fair use to train an LLM on copyrighted text.
1.3M
10 posts, first seen 21h ago
DOJ argues training language models on copyrighted works counts as fair use.
The Department of Justice filed a statement of interest in the New York Times copyright lawsuit against OpenAI. Posts from legal reporter Eriq Gardner and others report that the filing takes the position that training large language models on copyrighted texts qualifies as fair use. The filing cites national security, economic prosperity, and scientific progress as reasons to reject claims of infringement. A direct link to the court document on courtlistener.com appears in the visible posts. Replies debate the broader effects on copyright enforcement.
The Trump Administration files a statement of interest in the copyright lawsuit brought by The New York Times against OpenAI, taking the position that it’s fair use to train an LLM on copyrighted text.
Positive accounts welcomed the DOJ siding with OpenAI in the New York Times copyright case as the right call that ends copyright restrictions and aids economic strength, while negative replies called it theft from creators that harms jobs.
Based on 123 sentiment-bearing replies from 102 accounts across 5 conversations.


Positive accounts welcomed the DOJ siding with OpenAI in the New York Times copyright case as the right call that ends copyright restrictions and aids economic strength, while negative replies called it theft from creators that harms jobs.
Based on 123 sentiment-bearing replies from 102 accounts across 5 conversations.
#1
#1