Positive users praise Kimi K3's overlooked cost-per-task efficiency over Fable 5 for large-scale use, while negative users call the metric narrow and dismiss it due to latency drawbacks.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 13 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@rohanpaul_ai Your digital safety is essential. Secure your account before it's too late. @X_securitybot has the tools you need. Don't wait for a hack before taking action!!
@rohanpaul_ai Kimi beating Fable 2.8x on cost per task is the number the benchmark leaderboards never show.
@rohanpaul_ai Then why should anyone use Fable? It’s not like a Ferrari that you can use to impress people!
@rohanpaul_ai 2.8x on the metric Kimi was built for. Still waiting for the chart on the other metrics where Fable wins.
@rohanpaul_ai That cost efficiency gap is massive if you are running millions of tasks.
@rohanpaul_ai 14.7 tasks per $100 matters less when a prod fix has to wait 66 minutes.
For every $100 spent, Kimi completes 14.7 tasks versus Fable’s 5.3, giving you 2.8x more work per dollar. on software engineering/DeepSWE tasks.
Positive users praise Kimi K3's overlooked cost-per-task efficiency over Fable 5 for large-scale use, while negative users call the metric narrow and dismiss it due to latency drawbacks.
Based on 6 visible X reactions from 13 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.