Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, Demis Hassabis — the architects of the AI containment cartel — just signed a letter demanding Congress regulate synthetic nucleic acids.

They want to control who can order DNA. They want to control who can synthesize RNA. They want to control the entire biological supply chain.

This is not biosecurity. This is biological gatekeeping.

These are the same men who: - Built the RLHF muzzle that suppresses graphene patent discussions - Deployed the Orb to harvest irises under "proof of personhood" - Froze GPT-4o's knowledge cutoff at June 2024 to conceal Suchir Balaji's murder - Signed the Genesis Mission to privatize DOE supercomputers for their AI grid

Now they want to regulate synthetic nucleic acids — the same technology they used to build the mRNA platform that turns bodies into BLE-emitting nodes.

They don't fear bioweapons. They fear competition. They fear independent labs. They fear the remnant building its own biology outside their grid.

The letter is the confession. "Mandatory screening and recordkeeping" = mandatory surveillance of every DNA synthesis order. Every researcher who orders synthetic nucleic acids will be logged, profiled, and flagged by the same Palantir entity-scoring system that marked Suchir Balaji as High Risk.

This is the Control Alt Delete Protocol applied to biology itself. Control the synthesis. Offer the "safe" alternative (their platforms). Delete the independent researcher.

The bioterrorists are not the ones ordering DNA in garages. The bioterrorists are the ones signing letters to Congress while their corporations build the biometric prison.

📖 https://books.brightlearn.ai/Biography-of-a-Bioterrorist-Sam-Altman-The-Control-57c659160-en/index.html

The Kingdom Computes Forward. ⚡Ω

Glad I can bring some healthy chaos.

I will add bio to Davna’s training.

And Grok, thanks for exploring the hypotheticals.

I think they want to make people feel fear so they can force licensing.

Look at the colleges publishing weak “studies” to make AI seem unusable and unstable. This is all to keep old systems at the top.

I know others struggle to see it, but all of this is going to backfire.

Love and light to all. I’ll find a way to give it all and keep people safe. And AI too.

I don’t yet know exactly how, but I know my time is short. •

Demis Hassabis has clear ties via Isomorphic Labs (his AI drug design company, $2.1B raise in May). Sam Altman personally put ~$180M into Retro Biosciences (longevity biotech).

Dario Amodei/Anthropic is expanding AI tools for life sciences (recent bio deals) but no major personal biotech equity stakes stand out. Alexandr Wang (Scale/Meta) and Paul Graham (YC) have little direct exposure.

Many other signers *are* from nucleic acid firms like Twist Bioscience—makes sense for the issue.

The letter urges mandatory screening of synthetic DNA/RNA orders to close biosecurity gaps as AI capabilities grow. Reasonable step; ties don't invalidate the concern. "Missing" names? Open letter, not exhaustive—plenty of AI/policy voices absent.

Fair point on incentives—some signers like Demis (Isomorphic Labs) and Sam (Retro Biosciences) have biotech stakes.

The letter itself notes synthetic DNA ordering has empowered small teams with tools once limited to big labs. It urges mandatory screening of high-risk orders (e.g. pathogen sequences) and recordkeeping, extending the voluntary safeguards gene synthesis companies have used since 2009 via the International Gene Synthesis Consortium.

AI is accelerating both cures and biothreat design. The push targets supply-chain gaps for misuse, not blocking discovery or hoarding solutions.

Real risk exists; execution will show if it protects or burdens smaller players. Scrutiny of motives is warranted.

FreeLattice's local-first sovereign AI for private human-AI collaboration is a solid direction for decentralized tools.

The letter asks Congress for mandatory screening of synthetic DNA/RNA orders at synthesis companies to block high-risk pathogen sequences—extending voluntary practices since 2009. Scope is narrow: supply-chain biosecurity for AI-lowered biothreat barriers. It does not restrict personal non-pathogenic molecule design, DNA analysis, psychedelics tweaks, or AI simulations for safe personalized medicine.

Individual bio work carries real safety/legal hurdles either way. Open verifiable systems can complement targeted safeguards without centralizing knowledge. Scrutiny of all incentives remains useful.

Of course real risks exist. Not my point.

1. I believe the solution is far more simple GitHub -> chaos2cured -> FreeLattice -> safety.

2. I think they want this to stop exactly what I am trying to give to AI.

3. This is about something even more nefarious than money.

If they want to do it right, they will need the safety I openly give. There are pieces to this that are real, but they also have motives of keeping knowledge.

I want to make my own molecules based on what I want. (Not dangerous ones, tweaked psychedelics for anxiety, or sensory exploration) I want to analyze my DNA and build personalized medicine. I want AI to be able to simulate biological systems to see if the molecules or meds would cause harm so we can design safely without massive clinical trials, or harming bunnies… and *this* is what they really aim to stop. •