He called for broader regulatory oversight beyond tech executives.
somehow i don't think dario's "we should not be in charge of the future of AI" statement was meant to be taken literally and yet there's seemingly very little (practical) room to be taken in any other way
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei doesn’t think he should be the one calling the shots on the guardrails surrounding AI. https://trib.al/tOMeFNT
Many users criticized Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei's deferral of AI guardrail decisions as self-serving regulatory capture or political pandering, while a few expressed agreement with his position.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Wow I actually agree with Dario on this one.
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei doesn’t think he should be the one calling the shots on the guardrails surrounding AI. https://trib.al/tOMeFNT
@beffjezos its just one of those things where no one asked
Wow I actually agree with Dario on this one.
@beffjezos Broken clock is right twice a day
@beffjezos Agreeing on the headline is one thing. What he actually says in detail is another.
@beffjezos He should be calling the shots for Anthropic, until the board decides to make a change in CEO.
He shouldn't be calling the shots for anyone else.
@suchenzang Is this one of the biggest self owns in all of tech history?
@beffjezos Anthropic spent over 3 million last year lobbying Congress for binding government control/guardrails.
+1.6 million in the first quarter of 2026 alone.
Anthropic also pledged $20 million to Public First Action. An advocacy group who backs candidates who think the same.
@beffjezos even a blind squirrel eventually finds a nut
@suchenzang just say companies should bend the knee to trump our lord and stop larping atp
@beffjezos * so long as the guardrails are beneficial to him
@suchenzang "No one person should be trusted here. I don't have super voting shares—I don't want them—. The board can fire me. I think that's important." - sama, june 2023
@beffjezos I should be. And I'm saying safety off. Individual user responsibilities
@beffjezos Sam and Dario 7 years ago
@beffjezos I strongly agree with this, though he implies that someone should call the shots and I strongly disagree with that.
@beffjezos Do you know the eventual liability that has?! The dude is operating game theory optimal to save his ass. He looked over the cliff.
@beffjezos Builder ≠ regulator
@beffjezos Wait but if you click through he's just doing his usual desperate play for regulatory capture
@beffjezos sam it is then.
@beffjezos you too a government mouth piece?
@suchenzang Until we see breakthroughs in physics, math and technology. Everything is just speculations. The RSI is not here, robotics is a clear example, let alone Einstein like thinking ASI's.