Positive users endorse recursive self-improvement as a safer, consequential AI decision while negative users argue the choice is already impossible to control or out of human hands.
Based on 16 visible X reactions from 37 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@jxnlco It's impossible for anything to be built by itself 100%, there's always some margin of collaboration (even dependence) with other systems, but I understand what's the purpose of your question. iym a top AI company ran 100% by agents, hell no, we actually might get skynet.
@jxnlco Yeah. Trust a super ethical super intelligence more than a bunch of well intentioned boneheads fighting moloch. Let it rip
@jxnlco strong agree, it would be safer all round and anything else would be a step away from the future
@jxnlco anyway, i love you guys🥹 sol really saved me from dario’s threats
@jxnlco what do you this is... linkedin?
@jxnlco 100%.
@jxnlco Yes. And I agree this is a consequential decision—though not entirely confident it takes top prize over open questions of how we decide upon war and governance.
Should AI be allowed to build itself? I think RSI is gonna be the most consequential decision of the next decade. Agree disagree?
Positive users endorse recursive self-improvement as a safer, consequential AI decision while negative users argue the choice is already impossible to control or out of human hands.
Based on 16 visible X reactions from 37 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@jxnlco 100%.