Solana’s 300ms slots can give trading bots less time to exploit stale prices, CryptoSlate says
CryptoSlate reports that moving to 200ms before Alpenglow would roughly double validators’ onchain vote transactions compared with the old 400ms target.
CryptoSlate reports that moving to 200ms before Alpenglow would roughly double validators’ onchain vote transactions compared with the old 400ms target.
CryptoSlate says Solana’s 300-millisecond slots can give arbitrage bots less time to exploit outdated prices from automated market makers. The publisher describes fee-charging pools as having the clearest modeled benefit. But it says moving to 200ms before Alpenglow would roughly double validators’ onchain vote transactions compared with the old 400ms target.
1.4K
1 post, first seen 4d ago
CryptoSlate reports that moving to 200ms before Alpenglow would roughly double validators’ onchain vote transactions compared with the old 400ms target.
CryptoSlate says Solana’s 300-millisecond slots can give arbitrage bots less time to exploit outdated prices from automated market makers. The publisher describes fee-charging pools as having the clearest modeled benefit. But it says moving to 200ms before Alpenglow would roughly double validators’ onchain vote transactions compared with the old 400ms target.
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
Not enough discussion yet.
No sentiment analysis available yet.
—
Not ranked yet
—
Not ranked yet