Positive users praise the fun creative constraints in Claude's King James Bible bigram self-introduction, while negative users find its demonic references creepy and terrifying.
Based on 17 visible X reactions from 36 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@goodside It would be nice to include the full prompt. People might want to repeat this. Pretty cool and fun use case
@goodside i really like your experiments with imposed language limits, they are super fun
@goodside This series is the best LLM writing I’ve seen easily
@AndreBuckingham @goodside @AndersHjemdahl Yesss!
@goodside It would be nice to include the full prompt. People might want to repeat this. Pretty cool and fun use case
@goodside This series is the best LLM writing I’ve seen easily
@goodside this is terrifying
@goodside well thats creepy
Claude Fable 5 introduces itself using only a chain of bigrams found in the King James Bible, verified programmatically against the ~152k distinct bigrams in the KJV: https://x.com/goodside/status/2076666938957156852/photo/1
The remainder of Fable’s response, explaining that it programmatically verified the paragraph against ~152k bigrams extracted from the KJV: https://x.com/goodside/status/2076660355313401893/photo/1
Claude Fable 5 (Max) introduces itself in one paragraph using only bigrams found in the King James Bible: https://x.com/goodside/status/2076660348053049581/photo/1
Positive users praise the fun creative constraints in Claude's King James Bible bigram self-introduction, while negative users find its demonic references creepy and terrifying.
Based on 17 visible X reactions from 36 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@goodside well thats creepy
Claude Fable 5 introduces itself using only a chain of bigrams found in the King James Bible, verified programmatically against the ~152k distinct bigrams in the KJV: https://x.com/goodside/status/2076666938957156852/photo/1
The remainder of Fable’s response, explaining that it programmatically verified the paragraph against ~152k bigrams extracted from the KJV: https://x.com/goodside/status/2076660355313401893/photo/1