• Home
  • Technology
  • Gaming
  • Entertainment
  • World & Business
  • Science
  • Sports
  • AI
HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
Technology

AI agent checks and the risk of answering the wrong question

The New Stack points to the trace—the record of an agent’s execution—as the place to find evidence explaining what went wrong.

TN
1 Source, 20d ago, first seen 20d ago

TLDR

The New Stack describes an AI agent returning a 200 status code and passing a faithfulness check while still answering the wrong question. It says the evidence explaining that failure lies in the trace, rather than in those reassuring results alone.

Combined views

687

1 Source, first seen 20d ago

1 likes

Combined views

687

1 Source, first seen 20d ago

1 likes

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

Sentiment

Positive——Negative

Summary

Not enough discussion yet.

No sentiment analysis available yet.

1 Source

@thenewstackYour AI agent returned a 200, passed its faithfulness check, and still answered the wrong question. The evidence that explains why lives in the trace. Thanks to Dynatrace https://thenewstack.io/ai-agent-trace-debugging/?taid=6aa6b37512a7680001d3de61&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter20d
  • HomeTechnologyGamingEntertainmentWorld & BusinessScienceSportsAI
    • Home
    • Technology
    • Gaming
    • Entertainment
    • World & Business
    • Science
    • Sports
    • AI

    1 Source

    @thenewstackYour AI agent returned a 200, passed its faithfulness check, and still answered the wrong question. The evidence that explains why lives in the trace. Thanks to Dynatrace https://thenewstack.io/ai-agent-trace-debugging/?taid=6aa6b37512a7680001d3de61&utm_campaign=trueanthem&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter20d
    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet

    Today's Rank

    —

    Not ranked yet