Many users praised the AI-enabled scan for detecting severe heart damage missed by standard tests, citing its ability to save lives and avoid human fatigue, while one dismissed the claims as unconvincing to doctors.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
LLMs are very good with language bc the Internet is an Internet of language. To make AI medicine better, we need to build internets of human biology. Meaning, we need more data.
So it makes sense that the AI company here makes its services free to users so long as they send back data (presumably to improve their model)
This is going to get ridiculously common, very, very quickly.
It's already much more common than anyone outside medicine, and most people inside medicine, realize.
My prediciton is that before long malpractice insurers will either offer a discount for using AI or charge a premium for not.
@DKThomp This is a piece of crap and literally every doc I know has reacted with a gigantic eye roll.
@DKThomp Excellent!
Would be great to know false positive % too
@DKThomp That’s exactly where AI matters most
@DKThomp would an MRI have seen it?
@DKThomp after 10,000 normal scans your brain goes on autopilot. the 10,001st looks normal not because it is, but because you're tired. AI doesn't get tired.
@DKThomp Not sure it's exactly free-for-data. This sounds more like a partnership with OpenEvidence, possibly with some revenue sharing. But very cool either way!
@DKThomp AI diagnostics saved a life; early detection enabled life‑saving transplant.
@MattZirwas @DKThomp I sure hope so!