Users are excited that GPT-5.6 Pro autonomously solved a math problem posed by Daniel Litt because it sparks interest in detailed expositions and approval of the constructive diagonalization method.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Good. A constructive diagonalization is an affirmative formation that explicitly produces a diagonal index, two positively separated poles, and a witness to their coordination through a common projection. Formally: δ(b) = (i, u, v, w), where i is the diagonal index, u and v are the two poles, and w attests both to their separation and to the existence of a common projection such that p(u) = p(v) = i. Contradiction, non-contraction, and non-reconstruction do not define diagonalization: they may follow from it when they are incompatible with the witnessed separation.
@Tomodovodoo @littmath I would love to watch an exposition by @littmath of this problem and solution
(On vacation at the moment so may be a few weeks before I really have a chance to invest significant time to digest it, but I'm pretty excited.)
Still thinking through the details but I think this is likely correct! https://twitter.com/Tomodovodoo/status/2076027408042573905
Users are excited that GPT-5.6 Pro autonomously solved a math problem posed by Daniel Litt because it sparks interest in detailed expositions and approval of the constructive diagonalization method.
Based on 2 visible X reactions from 2 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.