VIEWS564LIKES11
Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs
@JohnHolbein1 "I was thinking this morning about how AI is pretty good at starting research projects, but not very good (at least for now) at finishing them." ← PhD-level intelligence
7hViews 564Likes 11
Original post unavailable.
Sentiment
Positive users praise AI tools like Claude for helping finish research projects and papers more effectively while negative users note it makes abandoning unfinished work for new ideas too easy.
Pos
66.7%
Neg
33.3%
4 comments with sentiment.
Cluster Engagement
Posts from X
Most Activity
Most Activity
RETWEETS1
Adam David Long@adamdavidlong
@JohnHolbein1 @mattBernius Maybe I’m just repeating your point but — for myself I’m noticing AI makes it super easy to start project B once project A hits the “hard part” ie actually finishing it.
5hViews 11Likes 1
REPLIES1
Adam David Long@adamdavidlong
@JohnHolbein1 @mattBernius Im also using Claude as a chief of staff / coach and have had some success with a routine where it writes down idea for new project but then says “we can do that once we finish this current project”
5hViews 8
joseph francis@joefrancis505
@JohnHolbein1 How dare you call my mountain of ongoing research projects half-baked!!
7hViews 419Likes 5
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1
@joefrancis505 some (not me) would say that all replication work is half-baked.
6hViews 164Likes 2
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1
@ryancbriggs all human, baby!
6hViews 428Likes 1
Ryan Briggs@ryancbriggs
@JohnHolbein1 Huh? It was a joke about how most PhDs like to start projects more than finish them?
6hViews 71Likes 1
Andrea Matranga 🇺🇦🌻@andreamatranga
@JohnHolbein1 I call it orphan code
6hViews 151Likes 2
joseph francis@joefrancis505
@JohnHolbein1 wait until you see my non-replication work!
6hViews 50Likes 2
John B. Holbein@JohnHolbein1
@ryancbriggs Ah--misread. :)
6hViews 63Likes 1
Ivan Korolev@ivankorolev89
@JohnHolbein1 In my experience, it has been a complete opposite. AI has made finishing projects (and converting ideas into completed papers) much, much easier than ever before.
6hViews 97
David Tindall@dbtindall
@JohnHolbein1 Interesting, if true.
6hViews 85
samir huseynov@huseynovecon
my prior is, even before ai, starting project had always been relatively easier than finishing it. of course, the definition of “starting” can change depending on person or discipline. in my line of work, if study design discussions lead to some promising design you can mark it as first milestone is passed. i tried reaching to this milestone several times with ai, but it is too quick and pretentious to convince me the design it discusses with me holds sufficient merit. however, it helped me a lot to move a good design that was done independent of it to implementation stage (coding of experiments and data cleaning). so, for me, it is more useful in finishing projects. jtc, cost of starting project for me is mostly mental (reading lit, trying to find gap, etc). so hard money wise it is “costless” but mentally it is not
5hViews 2
Adam David Long@adamdavidlong
@JohnHolbein1 @mattBernius Trying to build up the “spirit planning” muscle — decide on Sunday “what are we going to **finish** this week.”
5hViews 1