Dean, you know it's not. The Pause proposal is incredibly nuanced, arguing for a Pause on frontier development (not even a declarative stop! but a pause to independently assess safety outside of the dynamics of a race) while remaining agnostic to the distribution of existing capabilities. And even holding up narrow intelligence like autonomous vehicles as a positive vision for AI. That is a very non-bipolar position.
Calling for nuance can itself be a rhetorical device to linger in uncertainty while the powerful side continues unimpeded. What "everything all at once" are you talking about? SB 315 in Illinois? Let's get some wins on the safety side and then we can talk about an over-correction.