Positive users defend open-weight AI models by citing Linux's success against danger claims while negative users fear they empower bad actors to cause more harm.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
They argue open-sourcing dual-use technology improves overall system security.
well no, there's a marginal risk to releasing ~any powerful technology. closed models create marginal risk, too. the question with open-weight ai should always be about marginal risk + consider the existing risk of existing, closed frontier models. right now that calculation is still mostly favorable to open-weight ai; the marginal risk over closed models is not that large, and in the recent past is was functionally nonexistent.
@aran_nayebi @deanwball Surely it would. Open weights available to any bad actor to do more harm at scale than is currently possible.
@aran_nayebi linux running on basically every server on earth is a pretty strong counter to the "open source is dangerous" framing
For someone who is the "Head of Strategic Futures" at OAI, these are consistently naive & uninformed takes about open-source. For one, the history of Linux and its ubiquity in cyber/server-security suggests otherwise regarding such a risk of open-sourcing dual-use technology.
Of course, there are many examples where open source decreases the risk of cybersecurity issues (for example, Linux), but you are right, I think the best thing is just to forbid all other models besides the OpenAI ones...
Positive users defend open-weight AI models by citing Linux's success against danger claims while negative users fear they empower bad actors to cause more harm.
Based on 3 visible X reactions from 4 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.