OpenAI asks court to strike parts of Apple's new trade-secret evidence
The defendants argue that Apple introduced five expert declarations and other material too late in its bid for a preliminary injunction.
TLDR
OpenAI and the other defendants in Apple's trade-secret case have asked a federal court to disregard parts of the evidence Apple submitted with its reply for a preliminary injunction. Their September 24 filing argues that five expert declarations totaling 126 pages, along with additional exhibits, introduce new material after the defendants had responded to Apple's motion. They specifically seek to strike two declarations and portions of other evidence. The filing is a procedural objection, not a ruling on Apple's underlying allegations, and the court has not decided whether to exclude the material.
OpenAI asks court to strike parts of Apple's new trade-secret evidence
The defendants argue that Apple introduced five expert declarations and other material too late in its bid for a preliminary injunction.
TLDR
OpenAI and the other defendants in Apple's trade-secret case have asked a federal court to disregard parts of the evidence Apple submitted with its reply for a preliminary injunction. Their September 24 filing argues that five expert declarations totaling 126 pages, along with additional exhibits, introduce new material after the defendants had responded to Apple's motion. They specifically seek to strike two declarations and portions of other evidence. The filing is a procedural objection, not a ruling on Apple's underlying allegations, and the court has not decided whether to exclude the material.
