I am pleased to see that ECCV 2026 has desk rejected the papers authored by reviewers who misused LLMs in their reviews of other papers. I applaud the organizers for their courage in following through on this.
That said, agentic LLMs have now gotten good enough that the community must now solve the opposite problem: We need to aggressively incorporate AI into the review process. Ideally we should completely rebuild the process around vibe-reviewing with agentic LLMs in some way. If we don't, I expect we will be unable to accommodate the scale and rate of progress in the coming years. The only way out is through.

