An image posted by @TheMG3D shows a blue-haired figure and carries the caption that AI is not better than bad art. @ClaireSilver describes the surrounding discussion as split between people who see art as process and those who see it as result. @McKathlinDev lists objections including training on creators' works without consent and the loss of small creative steps. @BlackDumpling compares AI art to film directing through curation. @Skullgrin140 calls AI a cancer on creativity. Other replies note risks of over-reliance on AI for coding and the presence of judgmental viewers.
61.9K
12 posts, first seen 1d ago
Users reply to an AI-generated portrait of a blue-haired figure with views on creative process and training data.
An image posted by @TheMG3D shows a blue-haired figure and carries the caption that AI is not better than bad art. @ClaireSilver describes the surrounding discussion as split between people who see art as process and those who see it as result. @McKathlinDev lists objections including training on creators' works without consent and the loss of small creative steps. @BlackDumpling compares AI art to film directing through curation. @Skullgrin140 calls AI a cancer on creativity. Other replies note risks of over-reliance on AI for coding and the presence of judgmental viewers.
Many accounts rejected AI art as soulless and uncreative with no real artist behind it or consent in its training data, while others defended it as a valid tool that can deliver cleaner results than unskilled human efforts.
Based on 201 sentiment-bearing replies from 131 accounts across 5 conversations.


Many accounts rejected AI art as soulless and uncreative with no real artist behind it or consent in its training data, while others defended it as a valid tool that can deliver cleaner results than unskilled human efforts.
Based on 201 sentiment-bearing replies from 131 accounts across 5 conversations.