Users agree that AI will redefine 'worker' and 'job' to apply only to machines because they see the claim as very true.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@tunguz This is very true!
Yes and no. History of the term “computer” is very apt here. In the (near?) future terms “worker” and “job” will be transformed to exclusively apply to AI/machine activities. Whatever we end up doing (and I am very optimistic that we will end up doing something), it will be qualitatively different from what “working” at a “job” historically entailed.
IMHO, people who will have the hardest time when machines fully take over most of the economically valuable activities will be those who made the traditional understanding of the terms “work” and “job” core aspects of their identity, and even built a whole ideology around it.
@tunguz This is very true!
Yes and no. History of the term “computer” is very apt here. In the (near?) future terms “worker” and “job” will be transformed to exclusively apply to AI/machine activities. Whatever we end up doing (and I am very optimistic that we will end up doing something), it will be qualitatively different from what “working” at a “job” historically entailed.
IMHO, people who will have the hardest time when machines fully take over most of the economically valuable activities will be those who made the traditional understanding of the terms “work” and “job” core aspects of their identity, and even built a whole ideology around it.
Users agree that AI will redefine 'worker' and 'job' to apply only to machines because they see the claim as very true.
Based on 1 visible X reactions from 6 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.