Former OpenAI Sora researcher Gabriel Petersson warns of AI-generated "sloppening" on LinkedIn
Tanishq Mathew Abraham defended the platform's research-sharing culture
Users react to AI figures shifting from X to LinkedIn posting, with some praising the platform's algo and refreshing reception for NeuroAI content while others dismiss it as corporate slop, selfies, and AI-generated nonsense.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
Most Activity
@gabriel1 hey123
(LinkedIn really isn't that bad, lots of good papers posted there at least for medical AI)
it would be funny if we all committed to only posting and scrolling linkedin, like July 2 or something
comment hey123 if you are in

1) way to long post, LinkedIn people has the attention span of 3 yos. 2) the opening sentence is way to long and too thought leadership. Start with one sentence like that draws the attention like ”AI people are undervalued” or similar that makes people press ”read more” 3. Picture!!!!! 4. Respond to all comments within 1 hour, google ”LinkedIn golden hour” 5. Post either 15:00 Monday, 8:45 Wed or Friday and never post on weekends!!!

@gabriel1 LinkedIn is 99% really incredibly bad slop and that was true pre AI already
I do think it would be valuable to figure out how to get more reach there but my impression so far is that most of the viral stuff is via sponsored posts

@gabriel1 should we all move from X to LinkedIn?

@Rus_Khairullin that would be so funny

@gabriel1 That’s literally me. Work in the customs space, introduced all the consultants to AI. Built an entire domain specific corpus and rolled out an MCP for them all to leverage, and pretty much got all mundane work now in skills and workflows.

@gabriel1 Hey sounds a lot like computer use, would love to connect @gabriel1

@gabriel1 Just shitpost the same shit on LinkedIn you post here. I do that and people there think I'm absolutely refreshing and the impression rates are crazy good

@gabriel1 In general, if bullet points could teach good posting at either place - or translating good posts - there'd be more good posts at both.
For conveying that particular message here, start by omitting all but the last paragraph. First 5 are recycled conventional wisdom here.

@gabriel1 Linkeidn if full of corporate clowns who are trying to act like sugar daddies

@gabriel1 just name yourself jannik sinner and you’re done

@gabriel1 LinkedIn posting and X posting are two totally different games
Posts that bang on X barely get any likes there and vice versa

@gabriel1 the closest to being a good x poster is 20vc/harry stebbings, who has distinct teams. it's all AI slopped and halfway to diary of ceo level of clickbait tho. you can do better. for no extra benefit of course, but i'm assuming this is performance art

@gabriel1 linkedin is just about posting selfies and 99% of the posts are claude

@gabriel1 x algo eats personality, linkedin eats structure
biggest tip: short vertical video clips crosspost weirdly well

@gabriel1 No direct skill transfer except the meta of understanding an audience, because they are completely different audiences even when they're the very same people.

@gabriel1 1. An image would help feed placement. 2. This post would be better on LI if you stated your credentials and then gave some tips on how to find that “head of ai” you mentioned. Assume everyone on LI is like 90% less AI native than your X audience.

@gabriel1 cc @skeptrune

@Rus_Khairullin okay i posted

@gabriel1 i mean algo on linkedin is even better than on CT lol 🤣