Many users endorse the claim that simple reliable scripts outperform complex AI agents because they are simpler, cheaper, and more dependable, while others dismiss agent users as token-obsessed or lazy.
Based on 20 visible X reactions from 90 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@svpino 100%. A large portion of agent skills can usually be replaced by deterministic scripts. Better, faster, cheaper.
@svpino The best AI workflow is still the simplest one that works.
@svpino tkenmaxxing is laziness with extra steps and huge bills 😂
@svpino Scriptmaxxing >>>> Tokenmaxxing
@svpino I got 99 problems and agents are all of them
The tokenmaxxing culture is absolutely out of hand. You don't need an agent for everything. In fact, I'm 99% sure you don't need an agent for 99% of the problems you need to solve. Good engineering principles still apply. Simplicity still wins. A regular, boring ol' script that works every time is 1000 times better than a fancy agent that works sometimes. We need common sense back.
Many users endorse the claim that simple reliable scripts outperform complex AI agents because they are simpler, cheaper, and more dependable, while others dismiss agent users as token-obsessed or lazy.
Based on 20 visible X reactions from 90 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.