Many users welcomed the CMU professor's question on preparing for AI outperforming humans as a valuable line of inquiry, while some rejected the premise that humans will not stay superior.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 19 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@keenanisalive @CarnegieMellon @CSDatCMU Humans are better at everything and will be. The question always mixes the correct syntax. Just like planes are flown by pilots and do not fly by themselves, the computers do not run by themselves but run by humans. The computer is a part of you. You are better.
@keenanisalive @CarnegieMellon @CSDatCMU I think its usually ego https://x.com/latentsexplored/status/2079447601699803413?s=46 Agreed, we do need to think about how a world where humans aren’t better at anything looks like. Are there any good forums youve found? Would love to join!
@phillip_isola @xordrew @CarnegieMellon @CSDatCMU Thank you Phil, good suggestion! My former student @rohansawhney1 also recommended a recent series “Pantheon”: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pantheon_(TV_series) (Hope to bump into you at the next Packard reunion 😉)
@keenanisalive @CarnegieMellon @CSDatCMU I like this question! I dont agree with the premise but i think it's a really excellent line of questioning and thinking!
Posted on the @CarnegieMellon @CSDatCMU faculty Slack.
Many users welcomed the CMU professor's question on preparing for AI outperforming humans as a valuable line of inquiry, while some rejected the premise that humans will not stay superior.
Based on 4 visible X reactions from 19 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.