
@deanwball I suspect many partisan commentators on the left would have defended it as "This is what you get when you antagonize the Harris Administration."
The debate followed a hypothetical scenario about export-controlling Grok
Some users thanked the analyst for highlighting double standards in hypothetical Harris-era Grok export controls, while others called the critique biased, accused him of questionable motives on Anthropic, or labeled the point fearmongering.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.

@deanwball I suspect many partisan commentators on the left would have defended it as "This is what you get when you antagonize the Harris Administration."

@deanwball So in this imaginary world. Elon refuses to work with the US military. Tells everyone his AI can hack into government and corporate systems. Then releases to the world and it gets jail broken. Yeah I think the reaction would be the same.

@deanwball In a buble i agree with you, but @AnthropicAI is telling everyone they created a cyberweapon, they are fearmongering like hell. In a time wvere the US is on the verge of a open war with Iran. The russia and china problematic, what did @AnthropicAI expect?

@deanwball @grok can you help us imagine what they would’ve said? Maybe a video clip or a screenshot of a cable news talking head with a headline chryon?

@deanwball oh, there would have been a kerfuffle, for sure

@DennisTheProf @deanwball jailbroken lmaooooo

@deanwball Its still wrong.

@DennisTheProf @deanwball 1. Why are you implying it’s a wrong to refuse to work with the military? That’s a right every company has.
2. True, but other companies have the same capabilities, and they gimped the fuck out of the actually released fable model.
3. All models are jail broken, meaningless.

@deanwball Agree that it would have been apocalyptic from the All In crew. To be fair some of the muted reaction is based on the fact that they thought Trump was just going to look the other way. Harris they’d assume had an agenda to stop AI.

@deanwball Thanks for being loud on this Dean.

@deanwball Not a particularly illuminating exercise since she's someone with an entirely different governmental philosophy.
"Only Nixon could go to China" is an aphorism for a reason.

@deanwball I’ll take “racist and misogynistic” for $500, please Ken

@deanwball What is the point of the imagining?

@deanwball Someone enlighten me

@hamandcheese also true

Dario is winning. He gets AI regulated, the government is doing his marketing and any Fable-class+ open source gets onerous hoops to jump through, effectively locking frontier capabilities out of the enterprise. He also gets to make money selling the KYC tool stack to everyone downstream of him (you want to integrate Fable-class+ models in your systems? KYC, baby.) He'll also train on data he's forced to retain. The alphabet agencies will train on the data, too, but de-anonymized.

@deanwball I think given how many foreign nationals work at all of these companies, it would have been roughly as justifiable. 🧐

@deanwball Or even worse, imagine if she didn’t win and a bunch of 4chan moderators tried to use the Ai opportunity to retaliate

@hamandcheese Thank god Kamla harris had no balls 🙏

@adamconner @deanwball Ask Grok is currently available to Premium and Premium+ subscribers only. Subscribe to unlock this feature: https://x.com/i/premium_sign_up?referring_page=grok-post-2069423761242067190