Daniel Jeffries Claims AI Beats Most Human Code and Writing
Futurist Daniel Jeffries argues most human work in key areas falls short.
Daniel Jeffries stated that human-written code is mostly drek except from geniuses like John Carmack. He added that most human writing is garbage unless produced by masters such as Hemingway or Amy Tan. Jeffries described human driving as a yearly disaster that kills 1.2M people and injures 50M more. He concluded that AI represents an improvement for 99 percent of the population.
Combined views
268.2K
4 posts, first seen 2d ago
Reactions
4 postsDJ 
Daniel Jeffries@Dan_Jeffries1Human written code was mostly drek unless you were a genius like John Carmack. Most human writing is garbage unless you're a master like Hemingway or Amy Tan. Human driving is a nightmare that kills 1.2M and injures 50M more a year. AI is an improvement for 99% of the pop.
- likes: 1.8K
- replies: 198
- bookmarks: 291
- reposts: 155
BT Bojan Tunguz@tunguzHonest take. I fully agree with this.
- likes: 300
- replies: 11
- bookmarks: 46
- reposts: 7
SA Santiago@svpinoI agree that most people are horrible at writing. But I also have an immediate negative gut reaction when I realize that something was AI-generated. Maybe this shouldn't happen, but I can't control it. I read something written with AI, and I immediately reject it. For some…
- likes: 117
- replies: 55
- bookmarks: 19
- reposts: 4
DJ Daniel Jeffries@Dan_Jeffries1Agree if it's 100% generated. I often have the same reaction if I can tell the person didn't read it/shape it/edit it at all. But when someone works with it, interates, jazzes with it, I'm good with it and that is still a major improvement versus what they wrote on their own…
- likes: 9
- replies: 1
- bookmarks: 2
- reposts: 0