It should be 100% obvious that there will soon be mythos level models on cyber security that are open and available to anyone. As a byproduct of this, alternative tech stacks will emerge that also drive more economic value and control away from the US’s tech stack.
This is what should be considered when thinking through the gate keeping you want to have in AI. If advanced models will become open and available regardless, then by not allowing the release of models you’re neither more secure nor better off strategically.
So much of the regulatory approach to AI has to assume China can’t catch up, when all current evidence suggests they can and are. And further, hard to imagine a higher priority than winning in AI for China; so you’re basically betting against their long term ingenuity, talent and motivation. Seems like a bad bet.
So your options are either to create gates around your best models, which means you’re asymmetrically disadvantaging yourself, or you work to ensure you’re always at the frontier and driving the future architectures of AI.
JUST IN: A new Chinese AI model from Zhipu AI reportedly matches Claude Mythos’ performance at finding security bugs.


















