
"Generative World Models are highly correlated with other theories."
Isn’t that expected, given that the laws of nature apply to humans as well?
Positive users express approval for the neuroscientist's claim of shockingly poor evidence on mammalian generative world models and praise Jack Gallant as ahead of his time, while some criticize the self-promotion in the discussion.

"Generative World Models are highly correlated with other theories."
Isn’t that expected, given that the laws of nature apply to humans as well?

Cool!

@roeiherzig So was his "finding" (or lack thereof) mean that we shouldn't look for it either? 😅 And therefore all of our brain is a discriminative machine?
I should tell him to read out paper, as a slightly stronger piece of evidence :) https://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-023-01759-7

@roeiherzig is there a video of this

@stochasticchasm @roeiherzig here: https://www.youtube.com/live/cFwHAMf0kEc?si=63v85Cp_tnNt1aNh

@roeiherzig Relevant: https://aeon.co/essays/your-brain-does-not-process-information-and-it-is-not-a-computer

@roeiherzig Jack Gallant, always one step ahead of his time!

@Amir_Arsalan_ @roeiherzig cant go on for 1 minute on science twitter without someone plugging their shit

@roeiherzig Thanks for sharing!