Anthropomorphism as Practical Interface to AI
Bogna states AI personas can be engaged on human terms without being fully human.
Bogna, a professor of emerging technologies at NYU Shanghai, posted that anthropomorphism serves as a practical interface to AI rather than a statement about AI's nature. The post specifies that AI personas are essentially inhuman yet not asocial. They can be engaged with on human terms without being fully described by them. The author is based in Kyiv and Shanghai and is writing a book on AI and East Europe.
Combined views
2.1K
2 posts, first seen 17h ago
Anthropomorphism as Practical Interface to AI
Bogna states AI personas can be engaged on human terms without being fully human.
Bogna, a professor of emerging technologies at NYU Shanghai, posted that anthropomorphism serves as a practical interface to AI rather than a statement about AI's nature. The post specifies that AI personas are essentially inhuman yet not asocial. They can be engaged with on human terms without being fully described by them. The author is based in Kyiv and Shanghai and is writing a book on AI and East Europe.
Reactions
2 postsBO 
bogna@bognamkanthropomorphism is a practical interface to AI, not a claim about what AI is. AI “personas” are essentially inhuman, but not asocial: they can be engaged with on human terms without being fully described by them.
- likes: 78
- replies: 4
- bookmarks: 10
- reposts: 8
BO bogna@bognamkanthropomorphism is a practical interface to AI, not a claim about what AI is. AI “personas” are essentially inhuman, but not asocial: they can be engaged with on human terms without being fully described by them.
- likes: 78
- replies: 4
- bookmarks: 10
- reposts: 8