Positive users note that overregulation has at least shifted talent toward AI tools instead of ads, while negative users criticize it for pushing grift and bureaucracy that kills incentives in medicine and energy.
Based on 5 visible X reactions from 8 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
@tunguz “Imagine if all the talented people just making money came into this corrupted field so we can corrupt them too” is a helluva pitch. But it makes sense to those lost dweebs stuck in those fields, like crabs in a bucket
@tunguz this is true. i know intelligent people who went into medicine and they're writing grift papers to get into their chosen specialism due to the bureaucratic rather than meritocratic nature of medicine in the uk.
@tunguz Yea I mean at least the smartest people are now working on AI models/tools vs. social media/ads in the recent past...
@tunguz the grift part is what kills the incentive to even try
@tunguz “Imagine if all the talented people just making money came into this corrupted field so we can corrupt them too” is a helluva pitch. But it makes sense to those lost dweebs stuck in those fields, like crabs in a bucket
@tunguz this is true. i know intelligent people who went into medicine and they're writing grift papers to get into their chosen specialism due to the bureaucratic rather than meritocratic nature of medicine in the uk.
@tunguz Yea I mean at least the smartest people are now working on AI models/tools vs. social media/ads in the recent past...
@tunguz They don't seem that smart then.
This all sounds great in theory, but a lot of those smartest people ended up in tech working on marketing tools because energy, manufacturing, and medicine are so saturated with overregulation and grift that smart people can’t accomplish sh*t there as they are currently set up. https://twitter.com/sethbannon/status/2076433555237019837
@tunguz I do see the tide starting to turn here. People across the political spectrum are increasingly aware that regulation is a barrier, and we're putting some wins on the board in housing, nuclear, FDA, and more. Smart people can also contribute to fixing policy! @sethbannon
Telling smartest people what they should be doing is not very smart. https://twitter.com/sethbannon/status/2076727633099063765
Positive users note that overregulation has at least shifted talent toward AI tools instead of ads, while negative users criticize it for pushing grift and bureaucracy that kills incentives in medicine and energy.
Based on 5 visible X reactions from 8 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
This all sounds great in theory, but a lot of those smartest people ended up in tech working on marketing tools because energy, manufacturing, and medicine are so saturated with overregulation and grift that smart people can’t accomplish sh*t there as they are currently set up. https://twitter.com/sethbannon/status/2076433555237019837
@tunguz I do see the tide starting to turn here. People across the political spectrum are increasingly aware that regulation is a barrier, and we're putting some wins on the board in housing, nuclear, FDA, and more. Smart people can also contribute to fixing policy! @sethbannon