I'm impressed how thorough Fable is compared to all other models I've used so far. Impressively so. But silently nerfing LLM development is fucking ridiculous.
And, is the Conway's Law of AI emerging? It's got a bit of an attitude problem, its own god complex. Runs ahead and does things before you confirm with a lil dose of gaslighting... that it was sure you'd implied it should proceed, and had everything figured out anyhow.
Users in the replies criticize Anthropic for abandoning its original ethics and safety focus as an OpenAI offshoot and becoming like OpenAI itself, viewing the change as a loss of principles.
I'm impressed how thorough Fable is compared to all other models I've used so far. Impressively so. But silently nerfing LLM development is effing ridiculous.
And, is the Conway's Law of AI emerging? It's got a bit of an attitude problem, its own god complex. Runs ahead and does things before you confirm with a lil dose of gaslighting... that it was sure you'd implied it should proceed, and had everything figured out anyhow.
@wightmanr Anthropic had started as offshoot of OpenAI on ethics and safety now it has become OpenAI itself
Reminds me what Joker said in The Dark Knight. You either die a hero or love long enough to become villian
@wightmanr the conways law thing is interesting but also feels like a natural consequence of training on human text
bit of an attitude comes with the territory
I'm impressed how thorough Fable is compared to all other models I've used so far. Impressively so. But silently nerfing LLM development is fucking ridiculous.
And, is the Conway's Law of AI emerging? It's got a bit of an attitude problem, its own god complex. Runs ahead and does things before you confirm with a lil dose of gaslighting... that it was sure you'd implied it should proceed, and had everything figured out anyhow.