I can personally attest:
OpenClaude using GLM 5.2 is now performing on par with Claude Code powered by Opus 4.8.
The individual workflow claim lacks formal benchmark data.
I can personally attest:
OpenClaude using GLM 5.2 is now performing on par with Claude Code powered by Opus 4.8.
Many users celebrated GLM 5.2 powering OpenClaude to match Claude Opus 4.8 performance as a big win showing open source is rapidly catching up, while one reply insulted the project name.
No Digg Deeper questions have been answered for this story yet.
I can personally attest:
OpenClaude using GLM 5.2 is now performing on par with Claude Code powered by Opus 4.8.

@julientalbot974 @ClementDelangue https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude

@ZlpdmZdbrg you didnt heard OpenClaude ?
https://github.com/Gitlawb/openclaude

@fcesco im using our own OpenGateway

@Lakshman2302 have you sent email to freeglm@gitlawb.com?

@kevincodex OpenClaude? You mean OpenCode? Are you from the third world?

@kevincodex which provider are you using?

@kevincodex open source will win

@kevincodex @kevincodex When we get access to test it?
Thank you 😊

@kevincodex @grok

@masamune_hybs 🤣

@kevincodex @ClementDelangue In which harness ?

@kevincodex @ClementDelangue Just don't let it try to Read() images! Much annoyance during a long run. Otherwise, totally agreed that it feels indistinguishable from Opus

@kevincodex Big win for Open Source. The delay in Fable and GPT 5.6 is an equally big win for Open Source to catch up and almost come on neck-to-neck difference with the big models

@kevincodex 👀

@kevincodex 🔥

@brhkim @ClementDelangue yeah needs more improvement on that part

@kevincodex Amazing!🤩🤩

@kevincodex @kevincodex, i was just thinking OpenClaude's adoption is unreal, 29.4k stars, top 1000 on GitHub, the bridge I'm watching: converting those users into paid OpenGateway usage, since that's what feeds the buyback and burn, what's the plan there? 🦞🪽

@kevincodex This is some AI hype that's actually true, open source delivers