Users react to resurfaced 2022 Sam Altman emails on open sourcing GPT-3 by praising open models as the right path while criticizing apparent hypocrisy and pomposity in his past advice.
Based on 9 visible X reactions from 25 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.
Altman argued a local release posed minimal risk.
Gemma is a genuinely interesting open model from GDM. Wish Anthropic / OpenAI would follow this line. GDM have underlying funding that Anthropic / OpenAI don't have, so I can understand how they don't dare remove focus off things that will increase their value for their IPO. Simply releasing old models that they're about to retire would make large communities of people happy.
@TechEmails But China is doing it out of the goodness of their heart.
@TechEmails Open source is the way.
@TechEmails Pompousness of this email
@TechEmails @sama what happened to you?
Around this time the majority of compute at Stability AI was being used on building open LLMs but: 1. We didn’t do the easy thing of training GPT-J / Neo-X more (pre chinchilla!) 2. Couldn’t make it safe / tried to do too many changes to formula (Pile 2, Reddit crawls etc) We succeeded in building sota/frontier models of other all types that worked on the edge; but LLMs really were difficult to get working in consumer hardware then & even harder to do “right” In the end Mistral & Meta got the first wave of good quality open LLMs before the Chinese took over I honestly think OpenAI, Anthropic etc should have released really good quality edge open models with community interaction focused on how best to align these Lots of lessons to learn & Sam is right that it would almost have been safer given the better underlying datasets they had by then plus early RL. Also that it would have dried up some of the funding environment but..
Users react to resurfaced 2022 Sam Altman emails on open sourcing GPT-3 by praising open models as the right path while criticizing apparent hypocrisy and pomposity in his past advice.
Based on 9 visible X reactions from 25 accounts; directional sample.
Ask a question below.
Published answers will appear here.