Come on. Even with your recent safety stance you know this is nonsense.
Reality is bound by time, multiplicity, compute and many, many other factors.
There is no free lunch even for neural networks.
People are recursively self improving and limited by countless factors, not the least of which is the subject object problem.
There is no faster way to know if a drug will have side effects in twenty years or whether something got demonstrably better at writing, versus something like code which has a fast feedback loop and right or wrong answers.
Fast take off is utter and complete nonsense and you know it.
At least argue from a grounding in the reality you most definitely have instead of an argument that you absolutely know is not true. It totally undermines the veracity of your message.
If leading AI companies are indeed approaching the point of recursive self-improvement, a coordinated, verifiable, and universally applied pause is probably the only responsible solution to mitigate several major AI risks; at least until safety guarantees are developed and demonstrated. Ensuring that such a moratorium is respected would require sincere collaboration between various countries and companies, but I definitely believe it is achievable if others follow in @AnthropicAI's footsteps.






